Hello mates.
This is miles long, buckle up.
This week my good friend P sent me a charming video entitled ‘MILO effortlessly shuts down black feminist NAACP president’. The twat in question, a Milo Yiannopoulos, has been banned from Twitter according to Wikipedia, and gives unwavering support for Donald Trump, which is about all you need to know to sum him up. Why am I wasting my time on this waste of oxygen? Because of the 79,000 likes he got on Facebook for said video, the 129,389 shares by people who don’t know any better, and because of the twisted comments about feminism beneath (feminism is a hate group etc).
Who is this middle class white British guy to totally mansplain, incorrectly, issues affecting women and black people – to a female black person? Literally WHO DOES HE THINK HE IS?!!?!?!?? I can’t get over his ego and idiocy. The person he’s being a dick to, incidentally, is president of the NAACP group at the university at which he is speaking – which is one of the earliest and proudest organisations for black rights in America. Who the hell does he think he is? He knows nothing of these struggles.
Find this guy’s video, put him on split screen with me with your finger over the pause button, and let’s tear this guy’s non-argument to shreds.
The NAACP uni president says “You fail to mention that feminism is the belief that men and women are equal. So do you not think this? And also I noticed when you were talking about America’s values and about how great America is, you failed to mention that our nation was built on the power of white men without the acknowledgment of black people, the Indians, women at least, so do you not think that men and women are equal? Do you not acknowledge the problems that we have here in America that does in fact not make America great?”
He says “Women don’t agree with you.” Oh right, you know us all, do you? He says only 1/5 American women describe themselves as feminist while 85% believe in equality, because they know that ‘feminism’ has become twisted into ‘treating men like shit’ when it suits. Wtf?! No it hasn’t. He’s probably met one woman who hates men, assumed she’s feminist, and decided we are all out to get him and therefore it is OK to hate us all. Um. “Feminism is a mean, vindictive, spiteful, nasty, man-hating philosophy” – oh wow. Sorry for trying to make the world a better place with, ya know, education for women, equal wages, pointing out social inequalities, and – yes – tackling ‘men’s issues’ too like the damage caused by hypermasculinity and emotional repression. It has NOTHING to do with man-hating. It has everything to do with creating a better social atmosphere in which both boys and girls, and everyone of every gender identity, sexual identity, race, can grow up safe, respected, and validated, without the rigidities imposed by historical social norms. We need change. Look at practices from relatively recently that we now find offensive or barbaric – cockfighting, bear-baiting, animals in circuses, five-year-old chimney sweeps – I’m not comparing forcing little girls to play with dolls to chucking them up chimneys, but look how quickly our views can change and how much better we now perceive the world without those things that were once seen to be not only normal but desirable. If we allow in reason, change doesn’t have to be bad, and one day we might view present ‘genderisation’ (is that a word?) and inequality to be as alien a notion as mummifying your dead relatives and keeping them in the house (yep, happened in the good ol’ days).
Women aren’t abandoning feminism in their millions. I was under the impression we were entering a new dawn of feminism, actually. Go us. Can I also just point out how condescending his mannerisms, tone and facial expressions are? Continue.
Yikes, I have to say his 1/5 American women and 7% of UK women describing themselves as feminist seem to check out. Worrying. But I guess, then, they don’t know what it is. Not calling yourself a feminist in case people think you hate men is like not calling yourself a writer because once, someone wrote a book called Mein Kampf.
YES, THE PRIMARY PURPOSE OF FEMINISM IS EQUALITY. We don’t have time to ‘beat down on men’, there’s too much work to do. Unless, of course, by ‘beating down on men’ you mean ‘calling them out when they’re being sexist’. Which you may well do. Because men are never wrong. *Sigh*
With the older generations I think we do have a PR problem, yes. I’m not really sure why. But feminists are perfectly entitled to shout loudly to get your attention because, as P said, quote “It’s not like we’ve ever had to fight for the right to be treated like human beings or anything… It makes me so mad! The only reason we are so vocal is because we’ve been made to be silent for centuries” YAAAS P, slay.
“I do, I love women, and I care about them” oh dear. Good for you. Cos we need you to love and care about us. Actually, oh yeah, no we don’t. We would just like you to respect us as humans. Not because we are women. Because we have this radical idea that we’re just PEOPLE. Also would you feel you had to validate your opinion of men with “I love men, and I care about them”? No? Why not? Is it because they don’t need looking after? Would you be uncomfortable with saying you love men – and if so, why?
Hey, we are not ‘perfectly happy to treat men like shit’ and OH MY ‘spread these conspiracy theories about the patriarchy’ – WHOA WHOA WHOA THERE BIG FELLA you WHAT?!?! Oh my, see if he’d notice the matriarchy, if there was one, if from the age of 11 years old women leered at him in the street, grabbed his butt, told him he was provocative and it was his fault, prevented him from going to class because his shorts distracted the girls, told he was bad at maths because boys just are so he would never be an engineer but not to worry because he was pretty so he’d probably be able to find a rich woman to marry one day, and he could stay at home with the children where he belongs, or perhaps find a part-time job in the lowest-earning sectors and be paid less than even female colleagues in the exact same position, and then be required to pay a fortune for the upkeep of his unnaturally manicured and waxed body which he has to keep perfect otherwise he’s disgusting. AND BREATHE. But yeah, conspiracies, go.
Lies about campus rape culture? He clearly didn’t go to uni then – or he was so entrenched in it he couldn’t see it. Ouch.
And now, racism! Oh, he agrees with structural historical problems – good start, but they ain’t historical, they’re ongoing. And from there he wanders from Obnoxious Avenue to Ignorance Central. “I agree the black community has been treated like HELL by both democrats and republicans” – huh? I feel like using the word hell here is kinda inappropes, and also you are basically correct but this isn’t a party issue here. It’s an intrinsic racism problem through all walks of life. And you, a middle-class white British idiot (sorry America, we do seem to keep exporting them, don’t we?) ‘don’t think Black Lives Matter is the answer’? OoooKaaaaayyyy I’d like to see your solution, then. Comparing a powerful, striking, much-needed movement bringing attention to the ingrained racism of the supposed protectors (police) among others to ‘throwing your toys out the pram’ is INCREDIBLY insulting and shows zero understanding or respect of the fact that black lives are taken every day where white lives, in the same situation, just wouldn’t be. ‘Burning your own cities’ – YOUR cities – because you, as black people, are separate!! How’s about you look up your Brow v. Board of Education (1954), Sweatt v. Painter (1950) and your Civil Rights Act (1964) (hell yeah I paid attention in history… ok I had to check the dates but…) Separate but equal, sounds to me like what you just referenced. Wow. NO NO NO NO NOOOO.
‘If black people really wanted to improve their situation they would start voting for Republicans’ ahahahAHAHAHAHAHAahahaAHAHAHAHA no stop it’s hurting. Sure the big old Donald Fart is the answer, orange bag of foul-smelling wind he is.
Oh, I can’t even go into the prison stats right now, sorry, that’s a whole new post, this is too long already, SO. MUCH. WRONG.
‘Replacing the black dad’ referring to black dads, plural please, like they’re not people. ‘Do to you guys’ yep all you guys all you black people ALL O’ YOU right now. You not us. YOU GUYS. You black so this is you yep def for sure.
Hahaha nope, we think in this situation whoever in charge doesn’t really matter, mate. The police officers, the teachers, the housing people, they all stay the same no matter what colour the president wears. We’re past party politics when people are dying for the colour of their skin. ‘They need better schools’ yep that would be great but they don’t just appear from thin air. When black kids are fundamentally disadvantaged at school by racism, conscious or not, how is a white dude on a stage helping by telling them to ‘get better schools’ – funding? Teachers? Removing racism? Who starts it, when it’s harder for a black child to stay in class, to become the next gen teachers? And Black Lives Matter – ‘they cause a fuss’ – again completely infantilising, disrespecting, a movement trying to save lives taken for THE COLOUR OF SOMEONE’S SKIN. How fucking dare you.
Different prescriptions. Hell yeah. Disrespectful, uneducated, fact-free cockwombling moron. And I only feel free to insult him like that because I can defend my own arguments first. I’m not just shouting him down by calling him names. I’m not his hero Donald Drumpf. I can argue my defence and then call him names as a cherry on top to try to make me feel better about there being people like him in the world.
Anyway this is miles and miles long, hope you survived till the end,
Yours furiously,
Georgie
In Other News, Close Friends
Ages ago, I went to see some friends and we had a little get-together at their house. It felt rather grown up because instead of everyone getting smashed on vodka with Ring of Fire, it was wine and cheese that came out, and crackers and biscuits. Only one of my friends, let’s call him Steve, surreptitiously took out one of those biscuits with cream in the middle, pulled it apart, licked out all the cream and put it back in the packet. And my poor friend M had the misfortune to choose said biscuit. She had already eaten it when she said, “That tasted weird. I’m pretty sure the cream was missing,” when Steve cracked up and confessed. Vile.
The weirdest thing was, M wasn’t even annoyed. “I feel like we’re much closer now, Steve,” she said, quite cheerfully. Ew.